Many people think mediation and collaborative divorce are the same thing. Some members of the legal community may even indicate there is not much difference between the two. While it is true that collaborative divorce practice has its roots in mediation, it is a distinctly different process.
What is mediation? In mediation, a neutral third party helps a couple define their areas of disagreement, then leads them to draw up a legally-binding agreement. The mediator directs and controls the meetings which generally involve only the mediator and two disputing parties. The mediator cannot provide legal advice or advocate for either side but parties may hire and consult their own attorneys between mediation sessions.
Sometimes a divorcing couple chooses mediation, other times mediation is ordered by the court and may be limited to a particular issue. Mediators receive special training and are regulated by each state. Agreements reached in mediation are legally binding and entered with the court. A mediator is forbidden to reveal what was discussed during mediation and cannot be called as a witness should the mediation process fail and the case go to court.
What is Collaboration? Collaboration is a team process in which both parties and their respective lawyers meet together in four-way meetings to cooperatively resolve divorce issues. Each attorney advises and supports their own client, but they may also speak to each other during the process. The couple work together to develop an equitable agreement that meets the needs of all parties, particularly the children.
Meetings rely on the voluntary and free exchange of information and emphasize respect, cooperation, honesty and professionalism. There is emphasis on developing positive communication skills as a basis for future contact. Additional advisers such as financial or child specialists may be hired jointly to advise all parties. There is no timeline and parties may meet as frequently and for as long as it takes to arrive at agreement.
Collaborative lawyers and team members receive specialized training and many subscribe to the ethics of the International Academy of Collaborative Professionals. In addition, collaborative lawyers must have practiced family law for a minimum of 5 years. Agreements reached through the collaborative process are registered with the court and become legally binding. Should the collaborative process fail, the attorneys and advisers are prohibited from representing either party in court.
Next time: Collaborative Divorce vs Mediation: What IS the Difference?
For more information on both collaborative divorce and mediation, click here to visit the Family Law section of Michael Mastracci